Social Science — CBSE Class 10 board question

Economic Outcomes of Democracy:

1. Economic Growth: Evidence from 1950–2000 shows that dictatorships had a slightly higher average growth rate (4.42%) compared to democracies (3.95%). However, among poor countries specifically, the difference is negligible (4.34% vs 4.28%). Therefore, democracy cannot be called a guarantee of economic development, but it does not lag far behind dictatorships either.

1. Economic Inequality: Democracies have not been very successful in reducing economic disparities. In South Africa and Brazil, the top 20% of the population takes over 60% of national income, while the bottom 20% receives less than 3%.

1. Poverty Reduction: Democratically elected governments do not appear keen enough to address poverty. In Bangladesh, more than half the population lives in poverty.

1. Conclusion: Since the difference in growth rates is marginal, and democracy offers several other benefits like accountability and freedom, democracy remains preferable despite its economic limitations.

Source: Chapter 5 — Outcomes of Democracy, Economic growth and development / Reduction of inequality and poverty

---

• Examiners expect two main economic dimensions: growth and inequality/poverty reduction, with data support.
• Quoting the table figures (growth rates, income share percentages) fetches extra marks.
• End with a balanced conclusion — democracy is not economically perfect but is still preferable. Don't just criticise or just praise.
• Avoid writing everything about democracy in general; stay focused on the economic sector as asked.