Q1. [5] § 1.3 Why Non-cooperation? § Conclusion
Explain with examples the significance of the Non-cooperation Movement in the Indian national movement.
Previously asked in CBSE board exam
2025 32/4/1 Q30(A)
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · 2026-06-15 06:56 · grounding rag
Model Answer
Significance of the Non-Cooperation Movement:
- Theoretical Basis: Gandhiji argued in Hind Swaraj that British rule survived only because of Indian cooperation. If Indians refused to cooperate, British rule would collapse and swaraj would come.
- Mass Participation: The movement (January 1921) united diverse social groups — peasants, tribals, workers, and the middle class — under one national struggle, showing the breadth of anti-colonial feeling.
- Boycott of British Institutions: Indians surrendered titles, boycotted civil services, courts, legislative councils, schools, and foreign goods, directly weakening colonial authority.
- Workers and Tribals: Plantation workers in Assam defied the Inland Emigration Act and left tea gardens; tribals linked their local struggles to the national movement, widening its social base.
- National Unity: It forged emotional and organisational unity among people with varied aspirations, all responding to the call of swaraj.
Source: Chapter 2, Sections 1.3 and 2
---
Explanation
- Examiners expect named examples (Assam plantation workers, Chauri Chaura, etc.) — not just general statements.
- Cover: Gandhi's idea behind non-cooperation → stages of the movement → who participated → impact/significance.
- Mention Hind Swaraj for theoretical grounding; it shows conceptual understanding.
- Avoid writing lengthy descriptions of one point at the expense of others — spread marks across distinct points.
- 5 marks = roughly 5 crisp points with supporting detail, which this answer provides.
If a question refers to an image, map, graph or diagram that is not shown here, find the actual CBSE question paper on the CBSE website:
cbse.gov.in.