Democracy accommodates social diversities. Analyse.
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · 2026-06-15 06:59 · grounding rag
Model Answer
Democracy accommodates social diversities in the following ways:
- Political expression of differences: Democracy allows social differences based on gender, religion, and caste to be expressed politically. This expression is sometimes desirable as it gives voice to all groups.
- Mechanisms to negotiate conflicts: No society can fully resolve conflicts, but democracy evolves procedures to negotiate differences, reducing the possibility of tensions becoming explosive or violent.
- Power-sharing among social groups: Constitutional arrangements such as reserved constituencies ensure that weaker sections, minorities, and women are represented in legislatures and administration, preventing alienation.
- Majority works with minority: Democracy requires the majority to work with the minority so that government represents the general view — majority and minority positions are not permanent.
- Prevention of majority tyranny: Rule by majority must not become rule by a majority community based on religion, race, or language. Every citizen must have a chance of being in the majority at some point.
However, the example of Sri Lanka warns us that democracy must fulfil these conditions; otherwise, social conflict can intensify rather than reduce.
Source: Chapter 5 (Outcomes of Democracy), Chapter 1 (Power-Sharing)
---
Explanation
- Examiners expect 5 distinct, labelled points for a 5-mark question — each point earns 1 mark.
- The counterexample of Sri Lanka adds analytical depth and is directly from the textbook — include it for full marks.
- Avoid vague statements; tie each point to a specific mechanism (reserved constituencies, power-sharing, majority-minority balance, etc.).
- The phrase "non-democratic regimes suppress social differences" is a good contrast to include if space allows.