AI-generated practice question — model-generated for extra practice, not a previous-year CBSE board question.
(B) Machine-made British cloth flooded Indian and global markets, undercutting handmade goods on price.
Indian weavers lost export markets because British cotton manufactures, produced cheaply by machines, flooded Indian and international markets, making handmade cloth uncompetitive on price.
Source: The Age of Industrialisation, Section 3.3 – Manchester Comes to India / Section 2.6, Chapter 4.
---
The passage from Section 3.3 directly states: "their export market collapsed, and the local market shrank, being glutted with Manchester imports. Produced by machines at lower costs, the imported cotton goods were so cheap that weavers could not easily compete." Option B captures this precisely. Options A, C, and D are either unsupported or contradicted by the text — the colonial government actually removed barriers to British goods entering India, not imposed duties on Indian handlooms for export. Examiners expect you to identify the price undercutting by machine-made British cloth as the core reason.