Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

The variety of weavers' responses — migration, revolt, and abandoning weaving — reveals that no good option existed; only desperate choices were available. The Company's control stripped weavers of bargaining power: advance loans tied them to the Company, gomasthas enforced miserably low prices, and competing buyers were eliminated. Migrating merely relocated hardship; revolting was risky with little chance of success; shifting to agricultural labour meant abandoning a skilled trade entirely. These responses show weavers had lost all economic agency — they could neither negotiate prices nor sell freely — leaving survival, not prosperity, as the only goal.

Source: Chapter 4, Section 3.2 — What Happened to Weavers?

---

• The examiner wants analytical thinking, not just a list of the three responses. Connect each response to the constraints that made it a last resort.
• Key phrase to use: "no viable alternative" / "lost bargaining power" / "tied by loans."
• Avoid narrating the story again — interpret what it tells us about options available.
• The three responses (migration, revolt, abandoning weaving) are your evidence; the conclusion about lost agency is your answer.