Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

Peasant farmers could not directly access European banks because they lacked the required collateral, documentation, and creditworthiness that formal lenders demanded. European banks were unwilling to lend to small, scattered cultivators who had no assets to offer as security.

Indigenous financiers like Shikaripuri Shroffs and Nattukottai Chettiars filled this gap. They used their own funds or capital borrowed from European banks, and relent it to peasant farmers. They had a sophisticated system to transfer money over large distances and developed indigenous forms of corporate organisation, making credit accessible to small cultivators who could never deal directly with European banks.

Source: Indian Entrepreneurs Abroad, Chapter 3

---

• The key contrast is large plantations vs. humble peasants — the textbook explicitly states this distinction.
• Examiners expect you to mention: (1) peasants' inability to access banks directly, (2) the intermediary role of these financiers, and (3) at least one feature that made them effective (own funds/borrowed from European banks, money transfer system, indigenous corporate organisation).
• Don't just list names — explain the function they performed and why they were necessary.