AI-generated practice question — model-generated for extra practice, not a previous-year CBSE board question.
The HSRA (Bhagat Singh's group) believed that colonial power rested on state force, and only organised revolutionary violence could effectively counter it — appealing to the conscience of oppressors was naive against a regime that recognised only power.
The Gudem tribals under Alluri Sitaram Raju rejected non-violence because their immediate, local grievances — forest rights, forced labour — demanded urgent direct action; guerrilla tactics were the only practical tool available to them.
This reveals that Gandhian satyagraha, while powerful as a unifying idea, assumed oppressors could be morally persuaded — a premise that did not hold universally across different social and political contexts.
Source: Chapter 2, Nationalism in India
---
The examiner wants two distinct, contextually grounded reasons — not just "both used violence." Key contrast: HSRA = ideological/political disagreement with non-violence; Gudem = practical/local compulsion. The final line must draw a conclusion about Gandhian strategy's limits — that's what the "what does this reveal" part of the question is testing. Keep each point tight and don't repeat the same idea for both groups.