AI-generated practice question — model-generated for extra practice, not a previous-year CBSE board question.
The Justice Party, representing non-Brahman communities in Madras, chose not to boycott the council elections because entering the councils offered them a rare opportunity to gain political power — power that was usually accessible only to Brahmans. For this party, participating in the councils was a way to challenge Brahman dominance in local governance. Boycotting would have meant surrendering this hard-won political space. Thus, their decision prioritised community empowerment over Congress's call, making it rational given their specific social and political context.
Source: Chapter 2, Section 2.1 — The Movement in the Towns
---
The key fact is directly from the passage: "the Justice Party, the party of the non-Brahmans, felt that entering the council was one way of gaining some power – something that usually only Brahmans had access to." Examiners want you to clearly link the party's identity (non-Brahman), their goal (access to power), and why boycotting would have harmed their interests specifically. Avoid generalising — keep it specific to caste dynamics in Madras.