Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

Gandhi linked the Non-Cooperation Movement with the Khilafat issue to unite Hindus and Muslims under a single platform against British rule. His reasoning was that British power survived only because Indians cooperated with it; if all Indians — Hindus and Muslims together — withdrew cooperation, colonial rule would collapse and Swaraj would come.

This reveals Gandhi's broader strategy of forging a unified mass movement by bringing together different communities and their grievances under one common struggle. He and Shaukat Ali toured extensively to mobilise popular support across communities, showing his belief that national unity required bridging religious divides, not ignoring them.

Source: Chapter 2 — Why Non-Cooperation?, Differing Strands within the Movement

---

• Key point examiners look for: Two things — (1) Gandhi's logic (British rule survives on Indian cooperation), and (2) the strategic intent (Hindu-Muslim unity as the foundation of a mass national movement).
• Don't just describe the Khilafat issue — explain why Gandhi chose to link it, which is what the question asks.
• The phrase "various social groups participated, each with its own aspiration" from the passage supports the idea that Gandhi consciously tried to channel multiple grievances into one unified movement.
• At 3 marks (~60–90 words), two tight points with brief elaboration is enough — no need to list all details of the movement.