Q1. [3] deep thorough-understanding
Both the iron and steel industry and the cement industry use heavy, bulky raw materials and depend on efficient transport networks. Yet their locational decisions differ significantly — iron and steel plants are heavily concentrated in the Chhotanagpur plateau region, while cement plants are more widely dispersed across the country. What locational principle does each case illustrate? Why does the same broad constraint — the weight and bulk of raw materials — lead to different geographical outcomes for the two industries?
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · 2026-06-26 13:38 · grounding rag
Model Answer
Locational Principle:
- Iron & Steel illustrates material-index / raw material orientation — plants locate near raw material sources to minimise heavy transport costs (iron ore, coking coal, limestone in ratio 4:2:1).
- Cement illustrates dispersed/market + raw material orientation — plants spread widely across states near local limestone deposits and regional markets.
Different outcomes despite same constraint:
Iron and steel requires multiple bulky raw materials concentrated in one region (Chhotanagpur), making co-location near all inputs unavoidable. Cement requires limestone, which is available in many states across India, allowing plants to disperse and serve regional markets efficiently.
Source: Chapter 6 — Manufacturing Industries
---
Explanation
- Examiners want you to name the locational principle for each industry and explain why the same constraint (bulk/weight) produces different patterns.
- Key distinction: iron & steel needs several heavy inputs clustered in one belt (Chhotanagpur); cement's primary input (limestone) is geographically widespread, enabling dispersal.
- Avoid over-explaining; two focused points per part is enough for 3 marks.