Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

(i) Why individual consumers are especially vulnerable:

Consumers face information asymmetry — the company knows the drink has no special health benefits, but buyers do not. Media advertisements exploit this gap by making false claims. Individual consumers lack the technical knowledge to verify health claims on packaged products. They are scattered and act alone, making it difficult to challenge a large, resourceful company. As the textbook notes, consumers have the right to be informed about goods they purchase, but false advertising directly violates this right, leaving consumers deceived and potentially harmed.

(ii) Avenues available to seek justice:

Under COPRA (Consumer Protection Act, 1986), consumers can approach the three-tier quasi-judicial system:

• District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission — claims up to ₹1 crore
• State Commission — claims between ₹1 crore and ₹10 crore
• National Commission — claims exceeding ₹10 crore

A consumer can file a complaint with or without a lawyer, individually or as a class action suit. Consumer forums/protection councils provide guidance. Appeals can be made to higher commissions if a case is dismissed at a lower level.

Source: Chapter 5 — Consumer Rights, Sections: "Information about Goods and Services," "Where Should Consumers Go to Get Justice?"

---

• The examiner expects two clearly labelled parts matching sub-questions (i) and (ii).
• Key terms to use: information asymmetry, COPRA, right to be informed, three-tier system, District/State/National Commission, class action suit.
• For (i), focus on why consumers are at a disadvantage — knowledge gap + scattered individual buyers vs. large company.
• For (ii), name all three tiers with their monetary limits — this is frequently tested and fetches easy marks.
• Avoid writing a general essay; keep each part crisp and relevant to the scenario.