Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

The manufacturer's defence is unacceptable because consumers have the right to be protected against goods that are hazardous to life and property. It is the producer's responsibility — not the consumer's — to ensure that safety components like a pressure cooker's safety valve meet required quality standards before the product is sold.

A consumer cannot be expected to technically inspect internal safety parts. The manufacturer must strictly follow prescribed safety rules and regulations. If a defective valve causes an accident, the manufacturer is liable for negligence and must pay compensation. Public/government action also exists to enforce these quality standards.

Source: Consumer Rights – Safety is Everyone's Right, Chapter 5

---

• Examiners expect explicit mention of Right to Safety as a consumer right.
• Key points: (1) duty lies with producer, not consumer; (2) producers must follow safety rules; (3) liability for defective products rests with manufacturer.
• The textbook directly uses the pressure cooker example — quoting or paraphrasing it scores well.
• Avoid long essays; 3 marks = ~3 clear points in 2–3 sentences each.