'The impact of globalisation on workers has been largely unfavourable.' Do you agree? Justify your answer with three arguments.
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · 2026-06-26 13:25 · grounding rag
Model Answer
Yes, I agree that the impact of globalisation on workers has been largely unfavourable. Three arguments:
- Job insecurity: Employers now prefer flexible hiring, employing workers on a temporary basis instead of permanent employment to cut costs. Workers like Sushila lost permanent jobs and benefits.
- Poor working conditions: Workers are forced to work long hours, night shifts, and overtime at low wages, with no health insurance or provident fund.
- Unorganised sector expansion: Most workers today are employed in the unorganised sector, and even organised sector workers have lost earlier protections, making their conditions resemble the unorganised sector.
Source: Chapter 4 — Competition and Uncertain Employment
---
Explanation
- The examiner expects three distinct points, each clearly stated — one line each is sufficient for a 3-mark answer.
- Ground arguments in textbook examples (Sushila's case, garment industry) to score full marks.
- Avoid vague statements; use terms like flexible employment, temporary workers, unorganised sector — these signal textbook knowledge.
- Do not argue both sides; the question asks you to agree and justify.