A local company in a developing country enters into a joint production agreement with an MNC. Analyse the two-sided nature of this arrangement: what does the local company gain, and what risk does it potentially face based on how MNCs operate globally?
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · 2026-06-26 13:26 · grounding rag
Model Answer
Gains for the Local Company:
When a local company enters into a joint production agreement with an MNC, it benefits in two important ways:
- Additional Investment: The MNC provides money for buying new machines, equipment, and technology, enabling faster and larger-scale production.
- Latest Technology: The MNC brings advanced production technology that the local company may not have had access to otherwise.
Risk the Local Company Faces:
However, MNCs with enormous wealth often buy up local companies entirely rather than maintaining equal partnerships. For example, Cargill Foods bought Parakh Foods, taking control of its refineries and marketing network. Once acquired, the local brand and ownership are lost. MNCs also have the power to shift production to another country if costs rise, leaving local workers and companies vulnerable.
Thus, the arrangement is beneficial but carries the serious risk of loss of ownership and control.
Source: Chapter 4, Interlinking Production Across Countries
---
Explanation
- The textbook explicitly states the two-fold benefit: money for investment + latest technology. Use these exact points.
- The risk is not directly labelled in the text but is clearly implied: MNCs buy up local companies (Cargill–Parakh example) and can shift factories when costs rise (the cartoon caption). Examiners expect you to draw this inference from the passage.
- For 5 marks, cover both sides with brief examples. Don't just list — show cause and effect briefly.
- The Cargill/Parakh example is a textbook case study — citing it earns marks.