Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

Comparison of Haryana and Kerala:

| Indicator | Haryana | Kerala |
|---|---|---|
| Per Capita Income (2021–22) | ₹2,64,729 | ₹2,34,405 |
| Infant Mortality Rate (2020) | 28 per 1,000 | 6 per 1,000 |
| Literacy Rate (2017–18) | 82% | 94% |
| Net Attendance Ratio | 73% | 94% |

Although Haryana has a higher per capita income than Kerala, Kerala performs significantly better in IMR, literacy, and school attendance. This shows that per capita income alone is not a sufficient measure of development, as it does not reflect people's health, education, or overall well-being. Other indicators must also be considered.

Source: Chapter 1 — Development, Tables 1.3 and 1.4

---

• Examiners expect you to name three indicators and show the data for both states — a table is efficient and earns full credit.
• The key conclusion is the contradiction: higher income in Haryana yet worse human development outcomes. State this clearly.
• Avoid writing only in prose when data is available — a table saves words and is more precise.
• The phrase "not a sufficient/sole measure" is the expected conclusion language.