Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

Haryana has a higher per capita income than Kerala, yet Kerala has a far lower Infant Mortality Rate (6 vs 28 per 1000 live births) and a higher literacy rate (94% vs 82%). This reveals that income alone is not an adequate indicator of human well-being.

Money cannot buy all goods and services needed for a good life — such as a pollution-free environment, protection from infectious diseases, or quality education. Kerala's better outcomes are due to adequate provision of basic health and educational facilities, which are best provided collectively by the government. Thus, development must be measured using multiple indicators like health and education, not just income.

Source: Development, Income and Other Criteria / Public Facilities

---

• Key point examiners look for: The contrast between Haryana and Kerala is the textbook's central example to show income ≠ well-being.
• Mention the specific data (IMR and literacy figures) — it shows you read the tables and earns marks.
• The two core arguments are: (1) money can't buy everything, (2) collective provision of health/education is what makes the real difference.
• Avoid writing a long essay — 3 marks = ~3 clear points, each in 1–2 sentences.