Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

The critic raises valid points — democracy can be slow, has not always ensured economic growth, and corruption exists. However, these criticisms do not justify rejecting democracy.

On slowness: Democracy is based on deliberation and negotiation, which takes time. But decisions made through proper procedures are more acceptable to citizens and often more effective than quick authoritarian decisions.

On economic growth: Data (1950–2000) shows dictatorships had a slightly higher average growth rate (4.42%) than democracies (3.95%). However, among poor countries specifically, the difference is negligible (4.34% vs 4.28%). Economic development depends on many other factors, so democracy cannot be solely blamed.

On corruption: Democracies do fall short, but non-democracies show no evidence of being less corrupt or more responsive.

Most importantly, democracy provides a legitimate, accountable government chosen by the people. It ensures transparency, free elections, and the right to correct mistakes — outcomes no dictatorship offers. Across South Asia, 88% consider democracy suitable for their country.

Democracy is not a guarantee of perfection; it creates conditions for citizens to achieve their goals.

Source: Democratic Politics II, Chapter 5 — Outcomes of Democracy

---

• Examiners look for: acknowledgement that the criticism is partly valid (concede the point, use data), then a structured rebuttal using textbook evidence.
• Must mention: the growth rate data (Table 1), the "negligible difference in poor countries" finding, the legitimacy argument, and transparency/accountability.
• The phrase "democracy is a legitimate government — people's own government" is a key textbook line; include it.
• Do not just say "democracy is good" — back every point with evidence from the passage.
• 5 marks = roughly 5 distinct, well-supported points. Avoid padding.