Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

I partially agree. Government spending on schools and hospitals is necessary but not sufficient on its own.

Why it helps: Public facilities like schools and hospitals directly improve access to education and healthcare, which raises literacy rates, reduces infant mortality, and increases life expectancy — key development indicators used in HDI.

Why it's not automatic: Merely spending money does not guarantee outcomes. Quality of facilities, equitable distribution, trained teachers/doctors, and people's awareness also matter. As seen in the HDI data, countries with similar or lower per capita income (e.g., Bangladesh) sometimes perform better than India in health indicators, showing that how money is spent matters more than just how much is spent.

Therefore, government spending is essential but must be accompanied by quality, accountability, and equitable access to truly improve development outcomes.

Source: Chapter 1 – Development, Human Development Report section

---

• Examiners expect you to not simply agree or disagree — a nuanced answer scores full marks.
• Key link to establish: public spending → public facilities → health/education indicators → HDI/development outcomes.
• Use evidence from the chapter: HDI comparison, Kerala vs Haryana, or India vs neighbours to support your point.
• Avoid writing a vague essay; keep it crisp with a clear "yes, but..." structure for a 3-mark answer.