A non-democratic government can often make decisions faster than a democratic government. Why, then, can democratic decisions still be considered more effective?
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · 2026-06-26 13:18 · grounding rag
Model Answer
Non-democratic rulers need not consult anyone, so they can make decisions quickly. However, democratic decisions are still more effective because:
- Acceptable to people: Democratic governments follow proper procedures and deliberation, making decisions more acceptable to citizens.
- Transparency: Decision-making is based on norms and procedures, so citizens can examine whether correct processes were followed.
- Accountability: Democratic government is accountable and responsive to people's needs, making its decisions legitimate and long-lasting.
Thus, the extra time democracy takes is worth it, as its decisions face less resistance and are more durable.
Source: Chapter 5 — Accountable, responsive and legitimate government
---
Explanation
- Examiners expect you to acknowledge the non-democratic advantage (speed) first, then counter with three key reasons: acceptability, transparency, and accountability/legitimacy.
- The key phrase from the textbook is: "the cost of time that democracy pays is perhaps worth it" — try to echo this.
- Do not confuse "effective" with "efficient." Efficiency = speed; Effectiveness = whether the decision actually works and is accepted.
- For 3 marks, three distinct points with brief explanation each is the ideal structure.