Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

Both measures aimed to accommodate India's linguistic and cultural diversity while maintaining national unity.

Linguistic reorganisation redrew state boundaries so that people speaking the same language lived in the same state. Though initially feared to be divisive, it actually made administration easier and strengthened unity by giving communities a sense of recognition.

Language policy avoided imposing any single language on all citizens. Hindi was made official language, but 22 languages received constitutional recognition as Scheduled Languages. English was continued alongside Hindi after non-Hindi states protested.

Difference in approach: Linguistic reorganisation dealt with territorial accommodation, while language policy addressed administrative and official use of languages. One restructured political boundaries; the other regulated communication across those boundaries.

Source: How is federalism practised?, Chapter 2

---

• The question asks two things: (1) shared goal and (2) difference in approach — address both clearly.
• Examiners expect you to use textbook terms: "Scheduled Languages," "official language," "linguistic States."
• Avoid writing a general essay on federalism; stay focused on these two specific measures.
• 3 marks = roughly 3 distinct points: common goal + one measure + the contrast.