Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

Hindi is the mother tongue of only about 40% of Indians. Non-Hindi-speaking States, especially Tamil Nadu where the movement turned violent, feared that imposing Hindi would disadvantage their people in government jobs and public life, effectively reducing them to second-class citizens.

The Central Government, reflecting the federal spirit, responded by agreeing to continue the use of English alongside Hindi for official purposes beyond 1965. This showed flexibility and respect for linguistic diversity rather than imposing the majority language on minorities — unlike Sri Lanka's majoritarian language policy which led to civil war.

Source: Federalism – Language Policy, Chapter 2

---

• The examiner expects three elements: the reason Hindi was controversial (only 40% speak it), why non-Hindi States opposed the 1965 deadline (fear of disadvantage/discrimination), and how the Centre responded (continued English + Hindi).
• Mention Tamil Nadu's violent agitation — it's a key textbook detail.
• Draw the contrast with Sri Lanka's majoritarian approach to show you understand "federal spirit."
• Avoid writing a long essay; three tight points in 3–4 sentences is ideal for 3 marks.