Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

Yes, I agree that power sharing is the 'very spirit of democracy.' Two sets of reasons justify power sharing:

Prudential Reason: Power sharing reduces conflict between social groups and ensures political stability. Imposing majority will may seem attractive in the short run, but undermines national unity. For example, Sri Lanka's refusal to share power led to civil conflict.

Moral Reason: Power sharing is intrinsically valuable. People have a right to be consulted on how they are governed. A legitimate government is one where citizens participate and acquire a stake in the system. Indian federalism reflects this principle.

Thus, prudential reasons focus on better outcomes, while moral reasons stress the act of sharing as valuable in itself.

Source: Chapter 1 — Power Sharing, 'Why Power Sharing is Desirable?'

---

• Examiners look for: (1) a clear 'Yes I agree' stance, (2) one prudential reason with example, (3) one moral reason with example, and (4) a clear distinction between the two.
• Key distinction: Prudential = outcome-based (avoids conflict/instability); Moral = value-based (right of people to participate).
• Sri Lanka and/or Belgium are the standard textbook examples — use at least one.
• Don't write a long essay; tight paragraphs with the distinction clearly stated earn full marks.