Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

The argument is flawed because winning an election gives the majority the right to govern, not the right to ignore or override minority groups. This is called majoritarianism — when the majority community uses state power to impose its will on minorities, disregarding their interests and identity.

Why it is flawed: A democratic government must represent the general view of all citizens, not just the majority. Rule by majority should mean different groups forming the majority on different issues — not one permanent community dominating all others.

Long-term danger: Imposing the will of the majority community may seem attractive in the short run, but in the long run it undermines the unity of the nation. It generates conflict, resentment, and political instability, ultimately harming even the majority community.

Source: Chapter 1 — Why power sharing is desirable; Chapter 5 — Accommodation of social diversity

---

• The key concept to name is majoritarianism — examiners expect the term used correctly.
• Two distinct points are needed for 3 marks: (1) why the argument is logically/democratically wrong, and (2) the specific long-term danger (national unity, instability). Both are directly from the textbook.
• The Sri Lanka example can be added if space allows, but is not essential here.
• Avoid writing a general essay on democracy; stay focused on the flaw and the danger.